Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
no position
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
no position
+2pro-government
Its headlines take a side in 52 of 310 stories (17%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 44neutral in 258critical in 8
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 310 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 44 positive and 8 critical, 5.5 positive for every critical one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here +2.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει την «τεχνολογική πρωτοπορία» και η περίληψη παραθέτει τον πρωθυπουργό να λέει «Έχουμε κάνει μεγάλο άλμα» και «μπροστά από πολλές χώρες».
The model's explanation: Οι διατυπώσεις «Κοινό μέτωπο» και «επισφράγισαν τους ισχυρούς δεσμούς τους» παρουσιάζουν θετικά τη συνεργασία των δύο κυβερνήσεων.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
It publishes only news, so it has no position on the map.
How we choose the outlets on the mapWho owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Αικατερίνη ΤριμμάτηView full ownership chain →
The figure covers the whole publishing company, not this site's newsroom. Where one company publishes several sites, the same number appears on each of them.
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Η υποδοχή από τον Γεραπετρίτη και η «ατζέντα της επίσκεψης» αποτελούν περιγραφή διπλωματικής διαδικασίας χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση του υπουργού ότι το μνημόνιο είναι «άκυρο και ανυπόστατο» αποδίδει κυβερνητική θέση χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «Βολές κατά κυβέρνησης και δήμου για τις σχολικές υποδομές», προβάλλοντας κριτική στην κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει ότι ο πενταπλασιασμός «θα κρατήσει τις τιμές ψηλά» και η περίληψη ότι η παρέμβαση «στέλνει λάθος μήνυμα» και «θα κοστίσει πολλαπλάσια από όσα θα αποδώσει».
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.