Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
28 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος υποστηρίζει ότι το πακέτο «μπορεί να κάνει την Ελλάδα περιφερειακή υπερδύναμη», προβάλλοντας πιθανό όφελος από τις κυβερνητικές συζητήσεις.
The model's explanation: Οι δηλώσεις ότι τα F-35 «αναδεικνύουν τη σταθερή αμυντική σχέση» και ότι η Ελλάδα είναι «σπουδαίος σύμμαχος» προβάλλουν θετικά τη συνεργασία της κυβέρνησης.
1 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η αποδιδόμενη δήλωση ότι «Η σχέση με τις ΗΠΑ δεν ήταν ποτέ πιο ισχυρή» προβάλλει θετικά την κυβερνητική σχέση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Οι δηλώσεις «Η Ελλάδα γέφυρα διαλόγου» και «Πυλώνας σταθερότητας η Ελλάδα» προβάλλουν θετικά τον ρόλο της χώρας υπό την κυβέρνηση.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση ότι η εταιρική σχέση «ποτέ δεν ήταν πιο ισχυρή, βαθιά και συνεκτική» προβάλλει θετικά τη σχέση που διαχειρίζεται η κυβέρνηση.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει τις «συμφωνίες» και τη «συνάντηση με Μητσοτάκη», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής πράξης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «εκβιαστική συμφωνία» για το deal «με την κυβέρνηση» παρουσιάζει αρνητικά την κυβερνητική συμφωνία.
Have not covered it: Dnews, Documento, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, LamiaReport, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, To Manifesto, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The headline's side rests on a statement or act of a foreign government or an international body, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.