Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
33 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο Μητσοτάκης δηλώνει ότι οι σχέσεις «βρίσκονται στο υψηλότερο επίπεδο όλων των εποχών», προβάλλοντας θετικά την κυβερνητική εξωτερική πολιτική.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η εταιρική σχέση Ελλάδας–ΗΠΑ χαρακτηρίζεται «Πολύ ισχυρή» και οι σχέσεις «ιστορικά υψηλό επίπεδο».
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά στον υπουργό Εξωτερικών Γεραπετρίτη συνδέει την κυβέρνηση με τον ισχυρισμό ότι «Ενισχύεται ο στρατηγικός δεσμός».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Dnews, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι βρίσκεται «Σε εξέλιξη η συνάντηση Μητσοτάκη - Ρούμπιο» και παραθέτει τη δυνατότητα να γίνουν πράγματα σε οικονομία και ενέργεια, χωρίς ισχυρισμό επιτυχίας.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση ότι «Οι δεσμοί ΗΠΑ – Ελλάδας είναι βαθιά ριζωμένοι σε κοινές αξίες» αναφέρεται στις διμερείς σχέσεις, χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The model's explanation: Η επίσκεψη και τα θέματα «Οι συμφωνίες, η ενέργεια, τα F35» παρουσιάζονται ως ατζέντα, χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι «Υπεγράφησαν τρεις συμφωνίες» στους τομείς άμυνας, πολιτισμού και ναυτιλίας, χωρίς πρόσθετη αξιολόγηση.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η λίστα οπλικών συστημάτων που «ζητά η Ελλάδα» περιγράφει αιτήματα και αντικείμενα συζήτησης χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται στη «Συνάντηση Μητσοτάκη-Ρούμπιο» και σε όσα «μπορούμε να κάνουμε σε οικονομία, ενέργεια και εμπόριο», ως δυνατότητες και όχι ως επίτευγμα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.