Άρθρο αντεισαγγελέα Φλωρίδη για «φλέβα διαφθοράς» και η απάντηση της Ένωσης Δικαστών και Εισαγγελέων
17 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
17 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Most headlines of this story are not about the government. Only the outlets that wrote about it count in the monthly measurement:
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά σε «γιο υπουργού» συνδέει την υπόθεση με την κυβέρνηση, αλλά ο τίτλος και η περίληψη επικεντρώνονται στην αντίδραση του Αρείου Πάγου στο άρθρο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
