Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
10 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση ότι το πάρκο «αλλάζει το παραλιακό μέτωπο» και «κλείνει ένα χρόνιο ζήτημα» προβάλλει θετικό αποτέλεσμα.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «Ορόσημο για το παραλιακό μέτωπο» και η δήλωση «βάζουμε τέλος σε μία εκκρεμότητα δεκαετιών» παρουσιάζουν θετικά την κυβερνητική συμβολή.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Ορόσημο για το παραλιακό μέτωπο» προβάλλει θετικά το έργο που συνδέεται με τον πρωθυπουργό.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει δήλωση για το μέλλον —«η επόμενη τετραετία θα είναι άλμα ανάπτυξης»— η οποία είναι υπόσχεση ή πρόβλεψη και όχι ισχυρισμός ήδη επιτευγμένης επιτυχίας.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.