Μέτρα ΔΕΘ: Τι σημαίνει στην πράξη η αύξηση των συντάξεων – Αναλυτικά παραδείγματα
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation: Αφορά φορολογικές ρυθμίσεις που εισφέρει το νομοσχέδιο, τις οποίες περιγράφει ως «τι αλλάζει» χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η «δημόσια διαβούλευση» και η απαρίθμηση «φοροελαφρύνσεων», «αυξήσεων» και επιδόματος περιγράφουν τα μέτρα χωρίς να τα αξιολογούν.
The model's explanation: Η «δημόσια διαβούλευση» και η απαρίθμηση μειώσεων φόρων, αυξήσεων επιδομάτων και στεγαστικών μέτρων περιγράφουν τις προβλέψεις χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η «δημόσια διαβούλευση», η περιγραφή ότι «περιλαμβάνει μειώσεις φόρων και ασφαλιστικών εισφορών» και η εξοικονόμηση για τη νέα γενιά παρουσιάζουν τη νομοθετική διαδικασία και το περιεχόμενό της χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Οι «μειώσεις φόρων», ο «επενδυτικός κουμπαράς» και το «πακέτο ενισχύσεων» περιγράφουν το νομοσχέδιο χωρίς να αποδίδουν κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται σε «Παροχές 2 δισ. ευρώ» και ρωτά «Τι προβλέπει το νομοσχέδιο», παρουσιάζοντας το περιεχόμενο χωρίς κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφονται φορολογικές ρυθμίσεις («μειώνουν τον φόρο», «Αφορολόγητα tips») χωρίς να αξιολογείται η κυβερνητική απόφαση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
