Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
17 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει την κυβερνητική πρόθεση για τιμή «κάτω από τα 1,75 ευρώ» και τα μέτρα που προανήγγειλε ο πρωθυπουργός.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Μεταφέρει την κυβερνητική πρόθεση για τιμή «κάτω από τα 1,75 ευρώ» και τις εξαγγελίες του πρωθυπουργού χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Πανικός στο Μαξίμου προεκλογικά» και η σύνδεση με την «ενεργειακή ακρίβεια» προβάλλουν την κυβέρνηση ως πιεσμένη και αντιδρώσα.
The model's explanation: Το «Τριπλό “μπάλωμα” για την ακρίβεια» και το «Δεν αυξάνονται οι δικαιούχοι» παρουσιάζουν τις κυβερνητικές παρεμβάσεις ως ανεπαρκή αντιμετώπιση.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται σε «μέτρα στήριξης» και σε «νέο πακέτο ενεργειακών μέτρων» χωρίς να αποδίδει επιτυχία ή αποτυχία στην κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.