Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
20 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η αντίθεση «Από τον φόβο της χρεοκοπίας στην πρόωρη αποπληρωμή» παρουσιάζει την πρόωρη εξόφληση ως κυβερνητική επιτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «μπορεί να “σβήσει”» και η αναφορά στο υπόλοιπο περιγράφουν δυνατότητα και ποσά, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Η Ελλάδα μπορεί να “σβήσει”» περιγράφει πιθανή πρόωρη αποπληρωμή χωρίς να αποδίδει ρητά επιτυχία στην κυβέρνηση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αφορά τη δυνατότητα πρόωρης εξόφλησης, αλλά το «μπορεί να “τελειώσει”» περιγράφει εξέλιξη χωρίς ρητή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation: Το «Η Ελλάδα σβήνει τα δάνεια» και η αναφορά σε αποπληρωμή δύο χρόνια νωρίτερα περιγράφουν την εξέλιξη χωρίς ρητή αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την πρόθεση να «τα ξεπληρώσει δύο χρόνια νωρίτερα», χωρίς ρητό χαρακτηρισμό της κυβέρνησης ή της πολιτικής της.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «μπορεί να αποπληρώσει» και η αναφορά στο 2029 ή το 2030 παρουσιάζουν δυνατότητα και χρονοδιάγραμμα, όχι αξιολόγηση.