Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
19 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει «ποιες πλατφόρμες αφορά» και πώς θα ελέγχεται η ηλικία, ενώ θέτει το ζήτημα της προστασίας και της ελευθερίας χωρίς να καταλήγει σε έπαινο ή κριτική.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Οι «αλλαγές» και οι ημερομηνίες ψήφισης και έναρξης ισχύος του «ν/σ» περιγράφουν τη νομοθετική διαδικασία χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει τον «κόφτη» και το πώς «θα δουλεύει το QR code και το Kids Wallet», χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται διαδικαστική εξέλιξη του μέτρου, καθώς «στις 22 Οκτωβρίου ψηφίζεται» το νέο πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζονται οι προβλέψεις και η εφαρμογή του μέτρου, με αναφορές στο «τι θα ισχύει» και στο «πώς θα ελέγχεται η ηλικία».
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το «σχέδιο της κυβέρνησης» και τις «βασικές ρυθμίσεις του νομοσχεδίου» ως περιγραφή μέτρου, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Οι «νέοι κανόνες» και το «τι αλλάζει από 1η Ιανουαρίου» περιγράφουν το μέτρο χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.