FeedProtagoras has a configured feed for this outlet.
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
0neutral
Its headlines take a side in 225 of 1,000 stories (23%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 144neutral in 775critical in 81
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 1,000 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 144 positive and 81 critical, 1.7 positive for every critical one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here 0.
5 stories have not been judged yet.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation: Προβάλλει την εκτίμηση του πρωθυπουργού ότι το ταξίδι «από την καθυστέρηση στην πρωτοπορία» είναι «συναρπαστικό».
1 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση ότι «Οι Έλληνες βλέπουν ότι δεν χάθηκε ούτε ένα ευρώ» προβάλλει κυβερνητικό όφελος και επιτυχία.
From the outlet's editorials and regular columnists, not from its reporting. Artificial intelligence models read the texts, with the list of issues we publish.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Not on this map: Οικονομία, few texts.
Parties: their place from their official texts (programmes, decisions, speeches), with the same issues and the same arithmetic as the outlets.
Οικονομίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 0 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
Κοινωνίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 0 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
From its headlines on shared stories · Oct 2025 to Oct 2026.
None of the outlet's opinion texts took a side on an issue of the list.
Who owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Ιωάννης ΜπονάτσοςView full ownership chain →
The figure covers the whole publishing company, not this site's newsroom. Where one company publishes several sites, the same number appears on each of them.
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός Χρυσοχοΐδης περιγράφει την έρευνα και προβλέπει ότι οι εμπλεκόμενοι «θα συλληφθούν σύντομα», χωρίς να παρουσιάζεται κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος κατονομάζει τον υπουργό «Χρυσοχοΐδη», αλλά δεν αποδίδει στην κυβέρνηση αξιολογούμενη πράξη ή ευθύνη.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός ζητά συγγνώμη για «λάθη του συστήματος» και λέει ότι αυτό «δεν μπόρεσε να τον προστατεύσει».
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «αιχμές κατά της κυβέρνησης» και η περίληψη λέει ότι ο Σαμαράς απαντά στα σενάρια κόμματος «με αιχμές κατά της κυβέρνησης».
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.