Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
24 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Most headlines of this story are not about the government. Only the outlets that wrote about it count in the monthly measurement:
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει τον Μητσοτάκη στη φράση «Δεν πρέπει να κερδίσεις τον Μητσοτάκη, αλλά τον λαό», αλλά δεν αποδίδει στην κυβέρνηση ευθύνη για την ακρίβεια ή άλλο συγκεκριμένο αποτέλεσμα.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «κάθεται ο Μητσοτάκης και τρώει τώρα» παρουσιάζει επικριτικά τον πρωθυπουργό ως ωφελούμενο από την προηγούμενη διαμόρφωση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Kathimerini, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Parallaxi, Ta Nea, TVXS.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στην κυβέρνηση ότι αντί να φτιάξει υποδομές «έστησε το σκάνδαλο του ΟΠΕΚΕΠΕ».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος κατηγορεί ευθέως την κυβέρνηση ότι «συντηρεί ακόμα το σκάνδαλο του ΟΠΕΚΕΠΕ».
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη προβάλλουν «σφοδρή επίθεση στην κυβέρνηση» για τη διαχείριση ζωονόσων και την κατάσταση του κτηνοτροφικού κόσμου.