Συντριβή Phantom στην Τανάγρα: Σε πλήρη εξέλιξη οι έρευνες για τα αίτια της τραγωδίας – Τα κρίσιμα τελευταία δευτερόλεπτα
16 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
16 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει το πένθος για τους πιλότους και την «έρευνα για τα αίτια», χωρίς να αποδίδει κυβερνητική ευθύνη.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «Τι πήγε λάθος» αφορά τα αίτια της συντριβής, αλλά δεν αποδίδει την αποτυχία ή ευθύνη στην ελληνική κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Vima.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά τους πιλότους της Πολεμικής Αεροπορίας, ενώ το «Ήθελε να προστατεύει την πατρίδα» περιγράφει έναν πιλότο και όχι την κυβέρνηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά σε «έρευνες για τα αίτια» και στο πένθος των Ενόπλων Δυνάμεων δεν αξιολογεί κυβερνητική πράξη ή ευθύνη.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
