Άμεσες Ξένες Επενδύσεις: Δέκα ερωτήσεις και απαντήσεις για το νομοσχέδιο
22 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
22 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος απαριθμεί «Κίνητρα, φοροαπαλλαγές και fast track αδειοδοτήσεις» και η περίληψη λέει μόνο τι «προβλέπει» το σχέδιο νόμου.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Οι «αλλαγές και τα κίνητρα» του νέου νομοσχεδίου παρουσιάζονται περιγραφικά, χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζονται τα «κίνητρα, οι τομείς και οι προϋποθέσεις» και ο στόχος του πλαισίου, χωρίς να προβάλλεται ως ήδη επιτευγμένη επιτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ρωτά «Τι αλλάζει» και η περίληψη καταγράφει προβλέψεις και διαδικασίες του σχεδίου νόμου χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Το υπουργείο «δίνει διευκρινήσεις» και παρουσιάζει τι προβλέπει το πλαίσιο, χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη παρουσιάζουν «Όλο το νομοσχέδιο» και τις προβλέψεις του ενημερωτικά.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος πληροφορεί «Ποια κίνητρα δίνει η Ελλάδα» και η περίληψη καταγράφει αλλαγές, κριτήρια και όρια χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός Ανάπτυξης ανακοινώνει «Νέα κίνητρα», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πράξης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
