Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
28 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «Ανοιχτό το ενδεχόμενο νέας παράτασης» και η περίληψη καταγράφει καθυστερήσεις και αίτημα ιδιοκτητών, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής ευθύνης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος θέτει «Γιατί ζητείται νέα παράταση» και η περίληψη αναφέρει «ανοιχτά σημαντικά ζητήματα» και αιτήματα της ΠΟΜΙΔΑ, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής απόδοσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η «Αναβάλλεται η υποχρεωτική πληρωμή» καταγράφει διαδικαστική εξέλιξη χωρίς να αποδίδει ευθύνη ή να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «Έρχεται νέα παράταση» και αίτημα της ΠΟΜΙΔΑ, ενώ η περίληψη περιγράφει τη λειτουργία του ΜΙΔΑ και τις διασταυρώσεις χωρίς ρητή απόδοση ευθύνης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.