Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
24 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την «πρώτη θέση» και το εκλογικό «προβάδισμα 13,6 μονάδων» της ΝΔ ως ευρήματα δημοσκόπησης.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει «Προβάδισμα της ΝΔ» και τα ποσοστά πρόθεσης ψήφου χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Proto Thema, Ta Nea, To Vima.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει το «Διψήφιο προβάδισμα ΝΔ» και ποσοστά της δημοσκόπησης χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει μόνο «Προβάδισμα για τη ΝΔ» στη δημοσκόπηση, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι «στο 26,3% η ΝΔ» και ότι «Νο1 πρόβλημα η ακρίβεια», χωρίς να αποδίδει ευθύνη ή να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει «διψήφιο προβάδισμα» της ΝΔ και ότι «η ακρίβεια [είναι] το κυριότερο πρόβλημα», χωρίς να συνδέει το πρόβλημα με κυβερνητική ευθύνη.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι η ΝΔ «Αυξάνει τη διαφορά» και ότι το ΠΑΣΟΚ πλησιάζει την ΕΛΑΣ, ως δημοσκοπικές μεταβολές.