CNN Greece (cnn.gr) is a Greek-language news website launched in November 2015 through a licensing partnership between DPG Digital Media and CNN. It combines CNN international news with local content and video.
Source: cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com ↗
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
few texts
0neutral
Its headlines take a side in 100 of 714 stories (14%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 59neutral in 614critical in 41
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 714 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 59 positive and 41 critical, 1.4 positive for every critical one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here 0.
6 stories have not been judged yet.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αναφέρεται στα «θετικά αποτελέσματα της επίσκεψης» και στην Ελλάδα ως «πυλώνας σταθερότητας», προβάλλοντας κυβερνητική επιτυχία.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Διπλωματική αντεπίθεση της Αθήνας» προβάλλει την κυβερνητική κίνηση ως δυναμική απάντηση.
From the outlet's editorials and regular columnists, not from its reporting. Artificial intelligence models read the texts, with the list of issues we publish.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Not on this map: Οικονομία, few texts.
Parties: their place from their official texts (programmes, decisions, speeches), with the same issues and the same arithmetic as the outlets.
Οικονομίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 0 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
Κοινωνίαno position
Few texts: it took a position on 1 of the 10 issues; at least 5 are needed.
From the editorials (counted together, with double weight) and the outlet's regular columnists · Mar 2026 to Oct 2026.
In how many opinion texts the outlet takes a side, for each issue on our list. First the 6 that count most.
1 for · 0 against · 0 mixed
Counts toward: Προοδευτικό
For · Regular columnist · Δημήτρης Πάφρας
«Αυτή η απάντηση έχει τρεις αδιαπραγμάτευτους πυλώνες. Ο πρώτος είναι η ταχεία μείωση των εκπομπών.»
Η κλιματική κρίση αναδιαμορφώνει τη θάλασσα, τις κοινωνίες και τη ζωή μας · 6 Mar 2026 · Open at the source · Dispute
Who owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Δημήτριος ΓιαννακόπουλοςView full ownership chain →
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «νεκροί οι δύο χειριστές» και «τριήμερο πένθος στις Ένοπλες Δυνάμεις» ως εξέλιξη, χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική δράση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο Χρυσοχοΐδης χαρακτηρίζει το περιστατικό «υπόθεση του κοινού ποινικού δικαίου» και αναφέρει ότι «Θα συλληφθούν όλοι», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η συγγνώμη του υπουργού για «τα λάθη του “συστήματος”» προβάλλει κυβερνητικό έλλειμμα.
The model's explanation: Το ΠΑΣΟΚ αφήνει αιχμές για τον διορισμό συνεργάτη του πρωθυπουργού και σημειώνει ότι «δεν απάντησε για το ΦΕΚ και το πτυχίο».
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.
