Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
60 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Most headlines of this story are not about the government. Only the outlets that wrote about it count in the monthly measurement:
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη αναφέρουν ότι ο υπουργός Άμυνας «επιστρέφει Αθήνα εκτάκτως», χωρίς να αξιολογούν την κυβερνητική αντίδραση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «νεκροί οι δύο χειριστές» και «τριήμερο πένθος στις Ένοπλες Δυνάμεις» ως εξέλιξη, χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική δράση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά «Επιστρέφει στην Αθήνα ο Δένδιας» περιγράφει κυβερνητική κίνηση χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η συντριβή Phantom «της Πολεμικής Αεροπορίας» και οι πρώτες πληροφορίες για την πορεία του περιγράφουν το συμβάν χωρίς κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «Επιστρέφουν στην Αθήνα Δένδιας και Τασούλας» αναφέρει κυβερνητική κίνηση χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά ότι «δεν έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί τα εκτινασσόμενα καθίσματα» αφορά το συμβάν, αλλά δεν αποδίδει ευθύνη στην κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η συντριβή αεροσκάφους «της Πολεμικής Αεροπορίας» και η «αγωνία για το πλήρωμα» περιγράφουν το συμβάν χωρίς να αποδίδουν κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή ευθύνη.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η συντριβή «στο Athens Flying Week» και η πληροφορία ότι κλήθηκαν ασθενοφόρα περιγράφονται χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης ή της ευθύνης της.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος χαρακτηρίζει το περιστατικό «σοβαρό ατύχημα» στην επίδειξη, χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση ή να της αποδίδει ευθύνη.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η πτώση Phantom «κατά τη διάρκεια επίδειξης» περιγράφεται ως είδηση για το περιστατικό, χωρίς απόδοση ευθύνης ή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «επιστρέφει εκτάκτως ο Δένδιας από την ΔΕΘ» περιγράφει κυβερνητική κίνηση χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none