Militaire
Militaire is a digital outlet focused on defence and politics serving the whole of Greece (national reach). It is published by MILITAIR ΜΟΝΟΠΡΟΣΩΠΗ Ι.Κ.Ε.
Militaire is a digital outlet focused on defence and politics serving the whole of Greece (national reach). It is published by MILITAIR ΜΟΝΟΠΡΟΣΩΠΗ Ι.Κ.Ε.
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
Our measurement comes from the outlet's own texts. Here you see it beside the readers' view, and you can give yours too. Readers never change the measurement.
Towards the governmentReaders: 0 of 30
ΟικονομίαReaders: 0 of 30
no position
ΚοινωνίαReaders: 0 of 30
no position
−2critical
Its headlines take a side in 23 of 42 stories (55%). Only these count towards the rating.
positive in 3neutral in 19critical in 20
Κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη (2023) · from headlines on 42 shared stories from September to October 2026, judged by an artificial intelligence model · changes every night
Only the stories in which its headlines took a side count: 3 positive and 20 critical, 6.6 critical for every positive one. Rating ±1 when one side has at least twice as many stories as the other, ±2 four times, ±3 nine times; here −2.
With so few stories, one or two more would change the rating.
A positive headline means it presents a government success, even when it reports a statement; it does not mean the outlet agrees.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
It publishes only news, so it has no position on the map.
How we choose the outlets on the mapWho owns an outlet does not shape the stance we measure for it, or the other way round.
Ownership is checked on its own, against its own sources. An outlet's stance is measured without looking at who owns it, and the same in reverse. Neither one ever feeds the other.
Παράσχος ΚαρβουνόπουλοςView full ownership chain →
Every position rests on texts and headlines shown on this page. If you are from the outlet and a position misrepresents you, write to us and say why.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά ότι «δεν έχουν χρησιμοποιηθεί τα εκτινασσόμενα καθίσματα» αφορά το συμβάν, αλλά δεν αποδίδει ευθύνη στην κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφεται η θέση του πρωθυπουργού ότι «Η Ελλάδα δεν θα δεχθεί υποδείξεις» για την αμυντική ενίσχυση, χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας ή αποτυχίας.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει ως κυβερνητικό μειονέκτημα τη «μονοδιάστατη εξωτερική πολιτική» και την «σιωπή για τα ελληνοτουρκικά», λέγοντας ότι η Ελλάδα εμφανίζεται «ως χώρα πελάτης των ΗΠΑ».
1 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη επικρίνει κυβερνητική επιλογή και έλλειψη ουσίας, λέγοντας «η κυβέρνηση Μητσοτάκη φαίνεται ότι έχει χαρίσει» την πυροβολαρχία και «από ουσία τίποτα».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
An artificial intelligence model judges every headline and writes its explanation. Before publication, a second model from another company judged 300 headlines again without seeing the first answer or the outlet. This is not a check by people.