Ελλάδα και Αίγυπτος ξεκινούν συζητήσεις για την επέκταση της οριοθέτησης της ΑΟΖ
42 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
42 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Διπλωματική αντεπίθεση της Αθήνας» προβάλλει την κυβερνητική κίνηση ως δυναμική απάντηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει ότι η κύρωση «Γυρίζει μπούμερανγκ σε Τουρκία και Λιβύη» και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι η εξέλιξη «ενισχύει τη διπλωματική κινητικότητα», προβάλλοντας θετικά την κυβερνητική αντίδραση.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει ότι η κύρωση «Γυρίζει μπούμερανγκ σε Τουρκία και Λιβύη» και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι η εξέλιξη «ενισχύει τη διπλωματική κινητικότητα», προβάλλοντας θετικά την κυβερνητική αντίδραση.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο χαρακτηρισμός «Διπλωματική αντεπίθεση της Αθήνας» προβάλλει θετικά τη διπλωματική αντίδραση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η «επέκταση της ΑΟΖ» και ο «νέος κύκλος συνομιλιών» παρουσιάζονται ως εξέλιξη χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, LamiaReport, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Vima.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει τις «Διαβουλεύσεις για την επέκταση» και την επικοινωνία του υπουργού ως διαδικαστικές εξελίξεις.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την επικοινωνία του υπουργού και την έναρξη συζητήσεων για «πλήρη οριοθέτηση ΑΟΖ» χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει «Διαβουλεύσεις επέκτασης» της συμφωνίας, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει ως διαδικαστική διπλωματική κίνηση τις «διαβουλεύσεις για επέκταση της συμφωνίας για την ΑΟΖ».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
