Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
19 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παρουσιάζει ως επίτευγμα ότι «Ο Κάθετος Διάδρομος λειτουργεί».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει κυβερνητικά μέτρα που «θα γίνει» και «θα αυξηθεί», παράλληλα με τη θέση για το καλώδιο, χωρίς να τα αξιολογεί ως επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Παρατίθεται η περιγραφή του πρωθυπουργού για «ένα αεράκι» και ο ισχυρισμός ότι οι επικριτές «εύχονται να στραβοπατήσουμε», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας ή αποτυχίας.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, Vradyni.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αποδίδει στον πρωθυπουργό τη διαβεβαίωση ότι το καλώδιο «θα προχωρήσει χωρίς καμία έκπτωση», δηλαδή μια θέση για την πορεία του έργου χωρίς αξιολόγηση αποτελέσματος.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει τη θέση και τη δέσμευση του πρωθυπουργού ότι το καλώδιο «μπορεί να προχωρήσει χωρίς έκπτωση», χωρίς να παρουσιάζει αποτέλεσμα ή αξιολόγηση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει τη θέση ότι το καλώδιο «μπορεί και πρέπει να προχωρήσει» και αναφέρει σχεδιαζόμενη παρέμβαση στην τιμή του πετρελαίου θέρμανσης, χωρίς να την αξιολογεί.