Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
16 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η «Αποκάλυψη “βόμβα”» για τη συμμετοχή του υπουργού σε διοίκηση σωματείου με τους γιατρούς προβάλλει επιβαρυντικά ερωτήματα για τη σχέση του.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Parapolitika, Proto Thema, To Manifesto, To Vima, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει την κατηγορία του ΠΑΣΟΚ ότι ο Πλεύρης «είπε ψέματα» για τη γνωριμία του με τους γιατρούς.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει την κατηγορία του ΠΑΣΟΚ ότι ο Πλεύρης «είπε ψέματα» για τη γνωριμία του με τους γιατρούς.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος χαρακτηρίζει «Σοβαρή καταγγελία» την υπόθεση και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ζητούνται εξηγήσεις από τον υπουργό Πλεύρη.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει την κατηγορία ότι ο Πλεύρης «είπε ψέματα» για τη σχέση του με τους γιατρούς, ενώ η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι το ΠΑΣΟΚ ζητά εξηγήσεις.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει το αίτημα του ΠΑΣΟΚ να διευκρινίσει ο Πλεύρης «γιατί είπε ψέματα» για τη γνωριμία του με τους γιατρούς.