Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
29 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το διάβημα της Αθήνας περιγράφεται ως κυβερνητική πράξη, ενώ το «στερούνται έννομης ισχύος» χαρακτηρίζει τα τουρκικά θαλάσσια πάρκα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «Διάβημα Αθήνας» αφορά κυβερνητική διπλωματική πράξη, ενώ οι «Αυθαίρετοι» είναι οι τουρκικοί ισχυρισμοί και όχι η κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το διάβημα έγινε «κατόπιν οδηγιών του υπουργού Εξωτερικών» και το «Στερούνται έννομης ισχύος» αφορά τους τουρκικούς ισχυρισμούς, όχι κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Estia, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Parallaxi, Rosa.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Το «Ελληνικό διάβημα» και η αναφορά ότι η πρεσβεία «προέβη σε διάβημα διαμαρτυρίας» περιγράφουν κυβερνητική πράξη, ενώ η δήλωση για το καθεστώς στο Αιγαίο δεν αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «Ελληνικό διάβημα» και η αναφορά ότι η πρεσβεία «προέβη σε διάβημα διαμαρτυρίας» περιγράφουν κυβερνητική πράξη, ενώ η δήλωση για το καθεστώς στο Αιγαίο δεν αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «διάβημα προς την Τουρκία» αναφέρει κυβερνητική διπλωματική ενέργεια χωρίς να την αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «διάβημα διαμαρτυρίας της Αθήνας» αναφέρει διπλωματική ενέργεια χωρίς να την επαινεί ή να την επικρίνει.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «Διάβημα της Αθήνας» περιγράφει κυβερνητική διπλωματική πράξη, ενώ η δήλωση για την κυριαρχία δεν αποτελεί αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.