Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
8 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός παρουσιάζεται να προβάλλει κυβερνητική δικαίωση, λέγοντας ότι «αποκαλύψαμε τη συνωμοσία».
The model's explanation: Ο Φλωρίδης προβάλλει δικαίωση της κυβερνητικής θέσης, λέγοντας ότι «αποκάλυψα την απάτη που στήθηκε για τα Τέμπη».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός προβάλλει ισχυρισμό κυβερνητικής δικαίωσης με τη φράση «αποκαλύψαμε τη συνωμοσία».
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός προβάλλει ως κυβερνητική δικαίωση ότι «αποκάλυψα την απάτη για τα Τέμπη».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none