Πιερρακάκης: Διπλή ασπίδα προστασίας στο πετρέλαιο θέρμανσης
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφεται η κυβερνητική ανακοίνωση για αμετάβλητα κριτήρια και αριθμό δικαιούχων («Δεν θα αλλάξουν»), χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφονται η κυβερνητική πρόθεση για «οριζόντια αύξηση» και οι όροι του επιδόματος, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη περιγράφει τους δύο άξονες των κυβερνητικών παρεμβάσεων («συγκράτηση της τιμής», «ενίσχυση του επιδόματος») χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη αναφέρουν τα δημοσιονομικά όρια («οι εφεδρείες δεν είναι άπειρες») και την αύξηση επιδόματος χωρίς να αξιολογούν την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει την κυβερνητική ανακοίνωση («Αυξάνεται το ποσό, ίδιοι οι δικαιούχοι») χωρίς να την χαρακτηρίζει επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει την κυβερνητική πρόταση («οριζόντια αύξηση» χωρίς αλλαγή κριτηρίων), χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Τίτλος και περίληψη περιγράφουν κυβερνητική παρέμβαση και αύξηση επιδόματος («θα αυξηθεί το ποσό») χωρίς να την αξιολογούν.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
