Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
36 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το «λουκέτο σε 182 μονάδες και στρατόπεδα» και την αναδιοργάνωση ως περιγραφή των αλλαγών, χωρίς σαφή αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι η «Νέα Δομή Δυνάμεων» κατατίθεται από τον υπουργό και «φέρνει αλλαγές», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη χαρακτηρίζει τη μεταρρύθμιση «φάση» προσαρμογής στους «ιμπεριαλιστικούς πολέμους» και στα «βρώμικα ΝΑΤΟικά σχέδια», προβάλλοντας επικριτικό πλαίσιο για την κυβερνητική πολιτική.
Have not covered it: Capital, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει χαρακτηριστικά της κυβερνητικής νέας δομής, όπως «Συνεργατικά drones» και «ταξιαρχία μη επανδρωμένων μέσων», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο Δένδιας παρουσιάζει κυβερνητικές αλλαγές και «υποσχέσεις για αυξήσεις», χωρίς να προβάλλεται αξιολόγηση της επιτυχίας τους.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την ενημέρωση που θα κάνει ο υπουργός στην Επιτροπή για την «Γ΄ φάση», ως διαδικαστική εξέλιξη.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζονται οι «Συγχωνεύσεις 126 στρατοπέδων, drones και δορυφόροι» ως στοιχεία της νέας δομής, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι «Συγχωνεύονται 56 μονάδες και 125 στρατόπεδα» και «Έρχονται αυξήσεις», χωρίς να τα παρουσιάζει ως επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ότι «κλείνουν 180 μονάδες και στρατόπεδα» και παραπέμπει στις αλλαγές που παρουσίασε ο υπουργός, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.