Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
30 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ως κυβερνητική απόφαση το «“Ναι” στο αίτημα για παραμονή των Patriot», χωρίς να την αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την άφιξη και ότι οι Patriot θα βρεθούν «στο επίκεντρο» της συνάντησης, χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική δράση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ουδέτερα ότι «ο Μητσοτάκης» θα συναντηθεί με τον πρίγκιπα διάδοχο.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ουδέτερα ότι ο Μητσοτάκης βρίσκεται στο Ριάντ «για Patriot, ενέργεια και EMC».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η «ειδική αποστολή» και η επίσκεψη «υπό μυστικότητα» περιγράφονται χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική για την κυβέρνηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει την επίσκεψη και τα θέματα «η παραμονή των Patriot, ο EMC και η ελευθερία της ναυσιπλοΐας» χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το «νόημα της επίσκεψης» και αναφέρει ότι το πρωθυπουργικό γραφείο δεν γνωστοποίησε το ταξίδι «για προφανείς λόγους ασφαλείας», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει το ταξίδι και την «απάντηση στο τουρκολιβυκό», ενώ η περίληψη καταγράφει τις «αιχμές Καραμανλή» χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική επίδοση.