Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
25 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η παραπομπή αναφέρεται ως διαδικαστική εξέλιξη και ο τίτλος εστιάζει στην «απάντηση Πατούλη».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η παραπομπή από τον υπουργό αναφέρεται χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση, ενώ ο τίτλος εστιάζει στην «πρώτη αντίδραση Πατούλη».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, To Manifesto, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η διαβίβαση των καταγγελιών στην Εθνική Αρχή Διαφάνειας περιγράφεται διαδικαστικά, ενώ ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον Πατούλη ότι «Ζήτησα ο ίδιος» τον έλεγχο.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη χαρακτηρίζει την παραπομπή «ορθή θεσμική οδό» ως αποδιδόμενη δήλωση του Πατούλη, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πράξης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο Πατούλης ζήτησε «τον έλεγχο εις βάρος μου» και η περίληψη ότι συντάσσεται με την παραπομπή, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ο Πατούλης ζήτησε από τον υπουργό «πλήρη και σε βάθος έλεγχο», παρουσιάζοντας την υπόθεση διαδικαστικά.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση ότι ο Πατούλης «Συντάσσομαι απόλυτα» με την παραπομπή και ότι ζήτησε έλεγχο καταγράφεται χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.