Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
12 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον υπουργό την υπεράσπιση ότι «η Ελλάδα δεν έχει γίνει “Βουλγαρία” στους μισθούς».
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει «Η απάντηση είναι όχι» και η περίληψη παρουσιάζει τον υπουργό να «αντικρούει την κριτική» περί εξίσωσης της αγοραστικής δύναμης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος θέτει το ερώτημα «Έγινε πράγματι η Ελλάδα “Βουλγαρία” στους μισθούς?» και η περίληψη αναφέρει μόνο ότι ο υπουργός αναφέρεται στα στοιχεία της Eurostat.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ρωτά «Μας πέρασε και η Βουλγαρία στους μισθούς;» και αναφέρει «Τι απαντά ο Σκέρτσος», ενώ η περίληψη λέει μόνο ότι σχολιάζει την κριτική της αντιπολίτευσης.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος θέτει το ερώτημα «Έγινε πράγματι η Ελλάδα “Βουλγαρία” στους μισθούς;» και η περίληψη αναφέρει μόνο ότι ο υπουργός σχολιάζει την κριτική της αντιπολίτευσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.