Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
36 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η Κεραμέως προβάλλει την «αποτελεσματικότητα του μέτρου» και ότι «προστατεύονται περίπου 2.500.000 εργαζόμενοι».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την επέκταση κυβερνητικού μέτρου «σε περισσότερους κλάδους» χωρίς αξιολογική διατύπωση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η εφαρμογή του μέτρου και η μελλοντική διεύρυνσή του παρουσιάζονται περιγραφικά («Επεκτείνεται η Ψηφιακή Κάρτα Εργασίας»).
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά κυβερνητικό μέτρο και την αναφορά της Κεραμέως για «2,7 εκατ. περισσότερες υπερωρίες», ενώ η επέκταση περιγράφεται χωρίς ρητή αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Naftemporiki, Rosa, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ανακοινώνει την ένταξη κλάδων στο μέτρο και το ύψος των προβλεπόμενων προστίμων ως πληροφορίες για την εφαρμογή, χωρίς αξιολόγηση: «Πρόστιμα έως 10.500 ευρώ».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά κυβερνητικό μέτρο και αποδίδει στην Κεραμέως αναφορά για «2,7 εκατ. περισσότερες δηλωμένες υπερωρίες», χωρίς να αξιολογεί ρητά την επέκταση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την επέκταση και αναφέρεται στα «μηνύματα από την αύξηση των υπερωριών», χωρίς να διατυπώνει ρητή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.