Κυβερνητικές πηγές για Ερντογάν: Να χαμηλώσει η ένταση που δεν ανεβάσαμε εμείς
25 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
25 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος λέει ρητά ότι «Θετικά διαβάζει η κυβέρνηση» τις δηλώσεις Ερντογάν.
The model's explanation: Η κυβέρνηση χαρακτηρίζει τις δηλώσεις «Καλοδεχούμενες» και αρνείται ότι «ανεβάσαμε εμείς την ένταση».
The model's explanation: Οι δηλώσεις χαρακτηρίζονται «Καλοδεχούμενες» και η κυβέρνηση αποδίδει την ευθύνη της έντασης αλλού λέγοντας «δεν ανεβάσαμε εμείς».
The model's explanation: Οι δηλώσεις χαρακτηρίζονται «Καλοδεχούμενες» και η κυβέρνηση αποδίδει την ευθύνη της έντασης αλλού λέγοντας «δεν ανεβάσαμε εμείς».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη περιγράφουν τις δηλώσεις ως κινούμενες σε «διαφορετική κατεύθυνση», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει μόνο την περιγραφή ότι οι δηλώσεις κινούνται σε «διαφορετική κατεύθυνση», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η κυβέρνηση σχολιάζει ότι οι δηλώσεις «κινούνται σε διαφορετική κατεύθυνση» και ζητά να «χαμηλώσει η ένταση», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της δικής της στάσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει μόνο ότι οι δηλώσεις κινούνται σε «διαφορετική κατεύθυνση από το πρόσφατο παρελθόν», χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
