Τεκμαρτή φορολόγηση: Ποιοι ελεύθεροι επαγγελματίες κερδίζουν από την κατάργηση των κριτηρίων του τζίρου και του προσωπικού
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
18 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αποδίδει στον πρόεδρο του Οικονομικού Επιμελητηρίου την κρίση «θετικό πρόσημο» για τις εξαγγελίες του πρωθυπουργού.
2 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει «Νέα εποχή» και «επιβράβευση των συνεπών», ενώ η περίληψη χαρακτηρίζει την παρέμβαση μία από τις «σημαντικότερες» της ΔΕΘ.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον πρωθυπουργό τον ισχυρισμό ότι οι προσαυξήσεις είναι «αυθαίρετες» και προβάλλει «Aνακούφιση για τις επιχειρήσεις».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος χαρακτηρίζει τη μεταρρύθμιση «Νέα εποχή» και προβάλλει την «επιβράβευση των συνεπών» από τον υπουργό Πιερρακάκη.
1 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρότι ο τίτλος αναφέρεται σε όσους «κερδίζουν έως 2.534 ευρώ», η περίληψη εξισορροπεί το όφελος με το ότι «δεν ωφελούνται όλοι» και ότι «το βασικό τεκμαρτό σύστημα [...] παραμένει».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει διαδικαστικά «Τι καταργείται, τι μένει και πώς αλλάζει ο φόρος» χωρίς να αξιολογεί το κυβερνητικό μέτρο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
