Βουλή: Άρση της ασυλίας των Αβραμόπουλου και Κωνσταντοπούλου
36 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
36 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει ως διαδικαστική εξέλιξη την εξέταση των υποθέσεων και την απόρριψη των αιτημάτων αναβολής: «Η ώρα της κρίσης».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση του βουλευτή της ΝΔ «Δεν έχω καμία σχέση με τις παράνομες πράξεις» και το αίτημα άρσης της ασυλίας του δεν αξιολογούν την κυβέρνηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει ουδέτερα το αποτέλεσμα της ψηφοφορίας στη Βουλή: «Ήρθη η ασυλία».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά βουλευτή της ΝΔ και την κοινοβουλευτική διαδικασία, χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση στις αναφορές «Υπόμνημα Αβραμόπουλου» και «πριν από την ψηφοφορία».
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αποδίδει σε Κωνσταντοπούλου την κατηγορία προς τη ΝΔ «Κατάπιατε την διαφθορά», προβάλλοντας κριτική κατά της κυβερνητικής παράταξης.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Dnews, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Parallaxi, Rosa, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Η απόφαση της Ολομέλειας και οι «βολές Ζωής κατά ΠΑΣΟΚ και ένταση με Καιρίδη» περιγράφουν κοινοβουλευτική διαδικασία και αντιπαράθεση, όχι αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής πράξης.
The model's explanation: Η απόφαση για τον βουλευτή της ΝΔ περιγράφεται ουδέτερα ως «Άρση ασυλίας» από την Ολομέλεια.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η άρση ασυλίας του βουλευτή της ΝΔ και η «Έντονη αντιπαράθεση» αναφέρονται χωρίς σαφή αξιολογική κατεύθυνση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Αφορά βουλευτή της ΝΔ και κοινοβουλευτική διαδικασία, ενώ το «Ήρθη η ασυλία» καταγράφει απόφαση χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
5 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά τον βουλευτή της ΝΔ Αβραμόπουλο και αναφέρει ουδέτερα ότι «Την άρση της ασυλίας τους αποφάσισε η Βουλή».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η άρση ασυλίας του βουλευτή της ΝΔ καταγράφεται διαδικαστικά με τη φράση «Άρση ασυλίας».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αφορά βουλευτή της ΝΔ, αλλά αναφέρει μόνο τη διαδικαστική εξέλιξη «Αίρεται η ασυλία».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Για τον βουλευτή της ΝΔ αναφέρεται διαδικαστικά ότι «Υπερψηφίστηκε η άρση ασυλίας», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
