Κυριάκος Μητσοτάκης: Οι παρατηρήσεις στους υπουργούς και το μήνυμα στη Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη – «Δική μου ευθύνη να αξιολογώ συμπεριφορές»
30 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
30 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει μήνυμα του πρωθυπουργού «Προσέξτε τι λέτε» και έμμεση απάντηση στη Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη, χωρίς σαφές αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Οι «προειδοποιήσεις» για «γαλάζια “φάλτσα”» και το «κλίμα εσωστρέφειας» προβάλλουν κυβερνητικές αστοχίες και εσωτερικό πρόβλημα.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τη σύσταση «ο λόγος μας να είναι μετρημένος και ακριβής», χωρίς να αξιολογεί σαφώς την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την οδηγία του πρωθυπουργού προς τους υπουργούς «να υπερασπίζεστε το σύνολο του κυβερνητικού έργου», χωρίς να αξιολογεί το έργο.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τις «παρατηρήσεις στους υπουργούς» και την απάντηση στη Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη, χωρίς να επιβεβαιώνει την κριτική περί «αλαζόνων υπουργών».
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι ο πρωθυπουργός ζητά «να είμαστε πιο μετρημένοι και πιο ακριβείς», χωρίς σαφές θετικό ή αρνητικό πλαίσιο για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει το μήνυμα του πρωθυπουργού ότι «ο λόγος μας να είναι μετρημένος, ενιαίος και ακριβής» και την ευθύνη του να αξιολογεί συμπεριφορές, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει μόνο «Το διπλό μήνυμα Μητσοτάκη στο εσωτερικό της ΝΔ», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει την απάντηση του πρωθυπουργού για τα «καβαλημένα καλάμια» και τα «σήματα» στους υπουργούς, χωρίς να υιοθετεί ρητά την κριτική.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
