Πετρέλαιο θέρμανσης: Τα σενάρια για την επιδότηση στην αντλία και την αύξηση του επιδόματος
26 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
26 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Η «νίκη στις Βρυξέλλες» παρουσιάζει ως επιτυχία κυβερνητική εξέλιξη, ενώ η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ο Μητσοτάκης θα επιχειρήσει να εξασφαλίσει περαιτέρω στήριξη.
The model's explanation: Η «νίκη στις Βρυξέλλες» παρουσιάζει ως επιτυχία κυβερνητική εξέλιξη, ενώ η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ο Μητσοτάκης θα επιχειρήσει να εξασφαλίσει περαιτέρω στήριξη.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η «νίκη στις Βρυξέλλες» παρουσιάζει ως επιτυχία κυβερνητική εξέλιξη, ενώ η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ο Μητσοτάκης θα επιχειρήσει να εξασφαλίσει περαιτέρω στήριξη.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «νίκη στις Βρυξέλλες» προβάλλει θετικά κυβερνητικό επίτευγμα, ενώ η περίληψη περιγράφει σχέδιο για μεγαλύτερη στήριξη στα καύσιμα.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, Mononews, Naftemporiki, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει τα μέτρα που «ανακοινώνονται» και «τι εξετάζει η κυβέρνηση», χωρίς να τα αξιολογεί ως επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει την επιδότηση και τη «μάχη Μητσοτάκη στις Βρυξέλλες» για μέτρα στήριξης χωρίς να αποδίδει επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παρουσιάζει σενάρια που «μελετά η κυβέρνηση» για επιδοτήσεις, χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει «επιδότηση και αύξηση επιδόματος» και προαναγγέλλει «κυβερνητικές ανακοινώσεις», χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει «διπλή παρέμβαση» και «μάχη στις Βρυξέλλες» για μέτρα στήριξης, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
