Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
24 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τη δήλωση του Δένδια «Δεν είμαστε απλώς εταίροι, είμαστε αδέρφια» χωρίς να προβάλλει αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει συνάντηση με έμφαση στην «ευρωπαϊκή αμυντική ετοιμότητα», χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική επίδοση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τα θέματα της συνάντησης («ευρωπαϊκή άμυνα και χρηματοδοτικά εργαλεία») χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Προβάλλει τη δήλωση «Δεν είμαστε απλώς εταίροι, είμαστε αδέρφια» και αναφέρει θέματα συζήτησης, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τη δήλωση ότι «Ελλάδα και Κύπρος στέκονται η μία δίπλα στην άλλη» και αναφέρει την αμυντική συνεργασία, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει προγραμματισμένη συνάντηση με θέμα την «ευρωπαϊκή αμυντική ετοιμότητα», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τη συνάντηση και τα θέματα συζήτησης («Κυπριακό και “Ατζέντα 2030”») χωρίς αξιολόγηση.