Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
36 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζεται η προθεσμία για διορθώσεις στο Ε1 ώστε οι δικαιούχοι να λάβουν την «επιστροφή ενοικίου», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη ανακοινώνουν την έναρξη της επιστροφής και το ύψος της, με τις φράσεις «έως 1.600 ευρώ» και «Άρχισε η διαδικασία», χωρίς έπαινο ή κριτική.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει την πληρωμή και το ύψ její ύψος για δικαιούχους, με τις φράσεις «Διπλή πληρωμή» και «έως τα τέσσερα ενοίκια», χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται η καταβολή μέτρου οικονομικής ενίσχυσης, με τις λέξεις «επιστροφή έως και δύο ενοικίων» και «οικονομική ενίσχυση», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά ότι κάποιοι έλαβαν «μόνο μία επιστροφή αντί για δύο» θέτει ζήτημα καταβολής, αλλά δεν αποδίδει ευθύνη ή αποτυχία στην κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η «διπλή ανάσα» περιγράφει την πληρωμή της ενίσχυσης, χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή απόφαση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζεται η εφαρμογή της επιστροφής ενοικίου και οι όροι της, με τις λέξεις «Σε εφαρμογή τέθηκε η διαδικασία» και «δικαιούχοι και οι προϋποθέσεις», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται η έναρξη και το ύψος του μέτρου «επιστροφή ενοικίου», χωρίς αξιολόγησή του.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.