Πετρέλαιο θέρμανσης: Πρεμιέρα με τιμές έως και 1,70 ευρώ το λίτρο – Πότε ανοίγει η πλατφόρμα για το επίδομα
31 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
31 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Οι πρατηριούχοι λένε ότι «θα αγοράζαμε στα 2 ευρώ χωρίς την επιδότηση», προβάλλοντας την επιδότηση ως όφελος.
1 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τις «επιδοτήσεις καυσίμων» και τις τιμές και τη διάρκεια των μέτρων ως πληροφορίες, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Η ακρίβεια “καταπίνει” επιδόματα και φοροελαφρύνσεις» και η σύγκριση με το αυξημένο κόστος θέρμανσης προβάλλουν ότι τα κυβερνητικά οφέλη αντισταθμίζονται από την ακρίβεια.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Το «Πόσο ακριβότερα θα το πληρώσουμε φέτος παρά τα μέτρα;» παρουσιάζει τα κυβερνητικά μέτρα ως ανεπαρκή απέναντι στην αύξηση της τιμής.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Parapolitika, To Manifesto, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει «πώς λειτουργεί η επιδότηση» και «ποιοι δικαιούνται επίδομα», χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητικά την πολιτική.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η αναφορά στις «εκπτώσεις και το επίδομα» περιγράφει πώς διαμορφώνονται οι τιμές, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο για την κυβέρνηση.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζονται περιγραφικά το «ενισχυμένο επίδομα», η «διπλή παρέμβαση» και το κόστος τους, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
