Ο νέος χάρτης φοροελαφρύνσεων για επαγγελματίες και επιχειρήσεις – Στα 2,2 δισ. ευρώ τα 17 μέτρα
36 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
36 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει «Τα 12 σημαντικότερα μέτρα» και το «χρονοδιάγραμμα έως το τέλος του 2029».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει το «χρονοδιάγραμμα υλοποίησης» των εξαγγελιών και την κυβερνητική αναφορά στα «όρια του υφιστάμενου δημοσιονομικού χώρου», χωρίς σαφή κυρίαρχη αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τα μέτρα του Μητσοτάκη ως «λίγα σε πολλούς» και τους αποδίδει «εκλογικά διλήμματα», υιοθετώντας επικριτικό πλαίσιο για τα κίνητρα της κυβέρνησης.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Mononews, Nea Kriti, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τις «μειώσεις φόρων, αυξήσεις μισθών και νέα επιδόματα» που ανακοίνωσε ο πρωθυπουργός, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι ο Μητσοτάκης «ανακοίνωσε μέτρα στήριξης» και παραθέτει τις παρεμβάσεις, χωρίς να τις αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει «Πακέτο μέτρων 2,2 δισ. ευρώ για το 2027» και τους αποδέκτες του, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τις παρεμβάσεις ως μέτρα που «αλλάζουν φόρους, μισθούς και συντάξεις», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τα «μέτρα στήριξης 2,2 δισ. ευρώ» και τις επιμέρους παρεμβάσεις, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
4 of its 4 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει «Το χρονοδιάγραμμα των μέτρων που ανακοινώθηκαν στη ΔΕΘ μέχρι το 2027».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Αφορά τις φοροελαφρύνσεις που ανακοίνωσε ο πρωθυπουργός και περιγράφει «ποιους και πώς θα ωφελήσουν», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής πράξης.
5 of its 5 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει το «Πακέτο 2,2 δισ. για κάθε επαγγελματική και κοινωνική ομάδα» ως περιεχόμενο σχεδίου, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει «12 σημαντικότερα μέτρα» και «συγκεκριμένες ημερομηνίες για την εφαρμογή» τους, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει το πακέτο που ανακοίνωσε ο πρωθυπουργός ως «Μέτρα ... για μισθούς, συντάξεις, στέγη, ενέργεια, οικογένεια», χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
