Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
18 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Οι χαρακτηρισμοί «Μεγάλη ανάσα» και «Χριστουγεννιάτικος μποναμάς» προβάλλουν τις κυβερνητικές παρεμβάσεις ως σημαντικό όφελος.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει «από πότε θα πάρουν» το επίδομα και τις αυξήσεις, ως πληροφορία για το χρονοδιάγραμμα του κυβερνητικού μέτρου.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει το επίδομα των «500 ευρώ (μεικτά)» και τις προβλεπόμενες αυξήσεις, χωρίς να τις αξιολογεί.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την ανακοίνωση του πρωθυπουργού για «Επίδομα Χριστουγέννων 500€» και τις παρεμβάσεις ως πληροφορία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει «Τα ποσά που θα πάρουν» οι δημόσιοι υπάλληλοι και πότε θα δοθεί το δώρο, ως ενημέρωση για τις παρεμβάσεις.
The model's explanation: Το «πακέτο της ΔΕΘ» περιγράφεται με τις αυξήσεις και την επαναφορά του επιδόματος, χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει «Τι ποσά θα πάρουν» και ότι οι μισθοί «αυξάνονται», ως περιγραφή των προβλεπόμενων παρεμβάσεων.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τα ποσά και το «Πότε θα πληρωθούν» ως χρονοδιάγραμμα παροχών, χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει πότε «το επίδομα Χριστουγέννων» θα δοθεί και πότε αυξάνονται οι μισθοί, ως περιγραφή μέτρων.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.