Πλεύρης: «Δεν υπήρξε καμία συνεργασία με τον Θεοδωρόπουλο»
33 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
33 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει την απάντηση του υπουργού για την «τυπική σχέση» και το ερώτημά του προς το ΠΑΣΟΚ, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η αντιπαραβολή «Συνιδρυτές το 2012, “απλοί γνωστοί” το 2016» και η αναφορά ότι κλήθηκε «να μαζέψει τα ασυμμάζευτα» παρουσιάζουν την απάντηση του υπουργού ως ασυνεπή και επιζήμια.
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, LamiaReport, Nea Kriti, Ta Nea, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει την απάντηση του υπουργού ότι η σχέση ήταν «Τυπική» και «δεν υπήρχε συνεργασία», χωρίς σαφή κυβερνητική αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την απάντηση του υπουργού ότι το ΠΑΣΟΚ κάνει «πολιτική σπέκουλα» και ότι το σωματείο «δεν λειτούργησε ποτέ», χωρίς σαφή κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος καταγράφει την απάντηση του Πλεύρη ότι «Δεν υπήρξε καμία συνεργασία», χωρίς αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει την απάντηση του Πλεύρη στην καταγγελία και τον χαρακτηρισμό της σχέσης ως «Τυπική και αγαθή», χωρίς αξιολογική κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
