Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
31 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει τη δήλωση του υπουργού «Δεν υπάρχει λόγος εκκένωσης» και η περίληψη παραθέτει στόχο αποτροπής καθιζήσεων, όχι αξιολόγηση αποτελέσματος.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει την κριτική των κατοίκων «Δεν μας έδωσαν σαφείς απαντήσεις για τίποτα» και την αγωνία για τα κτίρια μετά την ενημέρωση του υπουργείου.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος θέτει ως προϋπόθεση για την επανεκκίνηση «επαρκή μέτρα», και η περίληψη παραθέτει την πολιτική ηγεσία να λέει «Δεν υπήρξε λάθος στην Κυψέλη».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι ο υπουργός «αναφέρθηκε στην πορεία των εργασιών», ενώ ο τίτλος παραθέτει τη δήλωση «Δεν υπάρχει λόγος εκκένωσης», χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ανακοινώνει την έναρξη αποκαταστάσεων και ότι είναι «Προτεραιότητα η ασφάλεια», χωρίς να τις παρουσιάζει ως κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Ο υπουργός δηλώνει ότι «δεν συντρέχει λόγος εκκένωσης», ενώ παρουσιάζεται ως «στόχος να αποτραπούν» καθιζήσεις, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής στάσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον υπουργό τη διαδικαστική σειρά «Πρώτα οι έλεγχοι και μετά η επανεκκίνηση».
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.