Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
23 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει τον ισχυρισμό «Ενισχύουμε τους εργαζόμενους γονείς» και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι το υπουργείο «ενισχύει περαιτέρω» τη λήψη της άδειας.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η διατύπωση «Ενισχύουμε τους εργαζόμενους γονείς διευκολύνοντάς τους» προβάλλει ως όφελος την κυβερνητική παρέμβαση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει κυβερνητική ανακοίνωση αλλαγών χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο, με τη φράση «Αλλαγές στις γονικές άδειες ανακοίνωσε».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τη νέα ρύθμιση για άδεια «έως 8 μήνες» και τον σκοπό «να διευκολύνει» τους γονείς, χωρίς να αξιολογεί την επίτευξή του.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, LamiaReport, News 24/7, Proto Thema, Rosa, To Vima, TVXS.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει «3 μεγάλες αλλαγές» και ότι το υπουργείο τις «προωθεί», χωρίς να παρουσιάζει σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει «τι αλλάζει» και τις «τρεις παρεμβάσεις» χωρίς να τις χαρακτηρίζει επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει «Νέες ρυθμίσεις για μεγαλύτερη ευελιξία» και τι θα ισχύει, χωρίς να προβάλλει αξιολόγηση του αποτελέσματός τους.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.