Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
25 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο Μητσοτάκης «θα αναλάβει τις ευθύνες του» σε εκλογικό ενδεχόμενο, χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, Kathimerini, Mononews, Naftemporiki, NewsIT, Proto Thema, Rosa, To Manifesto, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «ο μεγαλύτερος μύθος στην Ελλάδα είναι η “ακρίβεια Μητσοτάκη”» αποδίδει άρνηση κυβερνητικής ευθύνης, όχι ισχυρισμό κυβερνητικής επιτυχίας.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η φράση «ο Μητσοτάκης θα αναλάβει τις ευθύνες του» αφορά κυβερνητικό πρόσωπο, αλλά παρουσιάζεται ως υπό όρο και η δήλωση «Δεν φταίμε για την ακρίβεια» είναι διάψευση ευθύνης, όχι ισχυρισμός επιτυχίας.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη παρουσιάζει την ανάληψη ευθυνών από τον πρωθυπουργό ως ενδεχόμενο «αν πέσουμε στο 25%», χωρίς να προβάλλει αξιολογική κρίση για την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει τη θέση ότι ο Μητσοτάκης «θα αναλάβει τις ευθύνες του» αν η ΝΔ δεν πετύχει το 25%, χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος παραθέτει την άρνηση «Δεν υπάρχει ακρίβεια Μητσοτάκη» και η περίληψη λέει ότι ο πρωθυπουργός θα αναλάβει ευθύνες εάν η ΝΔ πάρει κάτω από 25%, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικού έργου.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.