Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
21 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ανακοινώνει προαναγγελθείσα αύξηση επιδόματος, με τις φράσεις «Τι αλλάζει» και «Αυξημένο επίδομα θέρμανσης».
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει κυβερνητικό σχεδιασμό και εκκρεμείς αποφάσεις, με τις φράσεις «μέτρων για τη συγκράτηση των τιμών» και «ενδεχόμενης προσωρινής μείωσης».
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Μεταφέρει τη δήλωση του πρωθυπουργού υπέρ ευρωπαϊκής παρέμβασης, με τη φράση «απαιτεί ευρωπαϊκή παρέμβαση», χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφει τον σχεδιασμό επαφών του πρωθυπουργού «με στόχο» την προσωρινή μείωση του ΕΦΚ, δηλαδή κυβερνητική πρόθεση.
3 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Καταγράφει μέτρα που ανακοίνωσε ο πρωθυπουργός, όπως «Οριζόντια αύξηση» και «Επέκταση της επιδότησης».