Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
32 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη αναφέρουν «Άμεσος έλεγχος στο ιατρείο» και την προτροπή του υπουργού, παρουσιάζοντας κυβερνητική ενέργεια χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη αναφέρουν ότι ο υπουργός ζήτησε «να διενεργήσει άμεσα το προβλεπόμενο έλεγχο», παρουσιάζοντας διαδικαστική κυβερνητική ενέργεια.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος και η περίληψη περιγράφουν κυβερνητικό σχέδιο για επιτροπή που «θα καθορίσει» τη λειτουργία των κέντρων, χωρίς αξιολόγηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει την ανάρτηση του υπουργού και αναφέρει ότι η άδεια ήταν «απλού παθολογικού ιατρείου», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
none
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, Kathimerini, Mononews, News 24/7, Proto Thema, Ta Nea, To Manifesto.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει ότι ο υπουργός ζήτησε έλεγχο και ότι η κλινική «είχε άδεια παθολογικού ιατρείου», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος περιγράφει την κυβερνητική πρόθεση για «νομοθετική παρέμβαση» χωρίς να την αξιολογεί ως επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον υπουργό τη δήλωση ότι ο Μαζωνάκης υπέστη ανακοπή σε «υποτιθέμενη κλινική», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής δράσης.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον υπουργό πρόθεση ελέγχου και αναφέρει ότι η κλινική «είχε άδεια παθολογικού ιατρείου», χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση της κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ανακοινώνει «Νομοθετική παρέμβαση» και η περίληψη αναφέρει ότι «Το πλαίσιο είναι γκρίζο», χωρίς να αξιολογεί κυβερνητική επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.