Απάντηση Σαμαρά στις αιχμές Μητσοτάκη από ΔΕΘ: "Το ποιος διαθέτει τεχνογνωσία για να βλάψει την παράταξη δεν το αποφασίζει η οικογένεια Μητσοτάκη - Ας ανησυχεί για τη δική του υστεροφημία" (Βίντεο)
15 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
15 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει την αντιπαράθεση για το ποιος μπορεί να «βλάψει την παράταξη», χωρίς συγκεκριμένη αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Παραθέτει την αιχμή για το ποιος μπορεί να «βλάψει την παράταξη», χωρίς συγκεκριμένη κρίση για την κυβερνητική επίδοση.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Τονίζει την κατηγορία ότι ο Μητσοτάκης «έχει την τεχνογνωσία να βλάψει την παράταξη», δηλαδή προβάλλει κατηγορία περί βλάβης.
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Naftemporiki, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
