Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
41 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
none
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει ότι «Κατατέθηκε η τροπολογία» και ότι «Το ύψος της ενίσχυσης θα καθοριστεί με ΚΥΑ», ως διαδικαστικές πληροφορίες.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η τροπολογία «θεσπίζει επιδότηση» και βρίσκεται «στη Βουλή», χωρίς αξιολογικό χαρακτηρισμό κυβερνητικής δράσης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, Mononews, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρεται στην «επιδότηση στην αντλία» και στον τρόπο που θα περάσει στους καταναλωτές, ως περιγραφή του μέτρου.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η κατάθεση της ρύθμισης και ο στόχος «να πέσει η τιμή του κάτω από 1,75 ευρώ» περιγράφουν μέτρο και επιδιωκόμενο αποτέλεσμα, όχι τεκμηριωμένη επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος ρωτά «Πότε ξεκινά» και «τι ποσό θα πάρουν», παρουσιάζοντας διαδικαστικές πληροφορίες για την επιδότηση.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρεται ότι «έρχεται επιδότηση» από συγκεκριμένη ημερομηνία, ως περιγραφή σχεδιαζόμενου μέτρου.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation: Η ρύθμιση για «την επιδότηση» κατατέθηκε «στο νομοσχέδιο του υπουργού», ενώ η χαμηλότερη τιμή αναφέρεται ως «Στόχος».
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Περιγράφεται διαδικαστικά η πρόβλεψη για επιδότηση, με «τροπολογία» και το «ύψος της επιδότησης» να προσδιορίζεται αργότερα, χωρίς αξιολόγηση της κυβέρνησης.
The model's explanation: Η «πρόσθετη παρέμβαση» και ο τρόπος λειτουργίας της επιδότησης περιγράφονται χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.