Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
15 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση «Κατά 55% αυξήθηκαν οι δαπάνες της έρευνας και ανάπτυξης από το 2019» και η αναφορά στην «επιστροφή επιστημονικού δυναμικού» προβάλλουν κυβερνητική πρόοδο στην έρευνα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει ως κυβερνητική επίδοση τον ισχυρισμό «Κατά 55% αυξήθηκαν οι δαπάνες της έρευνας και ανάπτυξης από το 2019».
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος προβάλλει ως επίτευγμα ότι «οι δαπάνες έρευνας και ανάπτυξης αυξήθηκαν κατά 55% από το 2019».
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει την «ενίσχυση της έρευνας» και τη «διεύρυνση συμμετοχής στο ERC» ως θέματα της συνάντησης, χωρίς να τα παρουσιάζει ως επιτευχθέντα αποτελέσματα.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Capital, Dimokratia, Dnews, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Eleftheros Typos, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, News 24/7, Parallaxi, Proto Thema, Rosa, Ta Nea, To Manifesto, To Vima, TVXS, Vradyni.
The model's explanation: Παρουσιάζει τη «στήριξη στους Έλληνες επιστήμονες» και τον «σχεδιασμό αυτοτελούς υπουργείου» ως αντικείμενα συζήτησης και στόχευσης, όχι ως αποδεδειγμένη επιτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.