Πολιτική αντιπαράθεση: Για μικροψυχία κατηγορεί την αντιπολίτευση ο Π. Μαρινάκης – «Διολίσθηση σε επικίνδυνη λογική», απαντά το ΠΑΣΟΚ
30 outlets covered itfirst report
Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
30 outlets covered itfirst report
Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η περίληψη χαρακτηρίζει τη συμφωνία «ιστορικής σημασίας» και παραθέτει την κυβερνητική κατηγορία ότι το ΠΑΣΟΚ «Κάνουν αντιπολίτευση στη χώρα».
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος μεταφέρει την τοποθέτηση του κυβερνητικού εκπροσώπου ότι «η αντιπολίτευση δίνει πολιτικό τόνο», χωρίς να αξιολογεί την κυβέρνηση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αποδίδει στον κυβερνητικό εκπρόσωπο την κατηγορία «κάνουν αντιπολίτευση στη χώρα, οχι στην κυβέρνηση», ενώ η περίληψη χαρακτηρίζει τη δήλωσή του «ιδιαίτερα προκλητική».
Have not covered it: Apogevmatini, Capital, Dimokratia, Documento, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Kathimerini, LamiaReport, Mononews, Nea Kriti, NewsIT, Parallaxi, Ta Nea, Vradyni.
As many positive as critical headlines on the story (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 critical), so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Ο τίτλος αναφέρει τη διαδικαστική διαβεβαίωση του κυβερνητικού εκπροσώπου ότι «Θα δημοσιοποιηθεί η συμφωνία όταν ολοκληρωθεί».
