Settings
Sign in with your email or continue with Google. No password needed.
39 outlets covered itfirst report

Usually, in a story: 19% pro-government · 58% neutral · 23% critical
For 54 outlets the group comes from the measurement of headlines on shared stories over the last one to three months; for 26 outlets with few headlines it is the editors' estimate. We count who covered the story, not how.
Bright: the outlets that covered it. Faint: those that have not (so far). Only outlets with a position on the map.
The map changes every night with the opinion texts read so far. An outlet appears on an axis once it has enough positions. Figures of 28 October 2026. So far, 26 outlets on the map.
Each headline is judged only on how it presents the government, not on the outlet that wrote it. Each outlet counts once, with the stance of most of its headlines, as in the monthly measurement. The headline is judged together with its short summary. The judgement and the explanation are written by an artificial intelligence model.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
1 of its 3 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Ο πρωθυπουργός προβάλλει ως κυβερνητικό όφελος ότι «φωτίζουμε ολόκληρη τη Θεσσαλονίκη, ολόκληρη τη Μακεδονία» και ότι η προσοχή της κυβέρνησης είναι στραμμένη εκεί.
The model's explanation: Η φράση του πρωθυπουργού «φωτίζουμε ολόκληρη τη Θεσσαλονίκη, ολόκληρη τη Μακεδονία» παρουσιάζει θετικά κυβερνητικό έργο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
none
Have not covered it: Dimokratia, Documento, Efimerida ton Syntakton, Eleftheria Larissa, Estia, in.gr, Rosa, TVXS.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση «Δεν φωτίζουμε μόνο τον Λευκό Πύργο αλλά ολόκληρη τη Θεσσαλονίκη» και η παρουσία του πρωθυπουργού στην τελετή περιγράφονται χωρίς αξιολογικό πλαίσιο.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation: Η παρουσία του πρωθυπουργού στην τελετή αναφέρεται διαδικαστικά, ενώ η φράση «αλλάζει όψη» περιγράφει τον νέο φωτισμό και όχι κυβερνητική επίδοση.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Η δήλωση «Η προσοχή της κυβέρνησης είναι στραμμένη στη Μακεδονία» εκφράζει κυβερνητική εστίαση, χωρίς να ισχυρίζεται επιτυχία ή αποτυχία.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation: Αναφέρει το «μήνυμα Μητσοτάκη» και την «ανάδειξη» και «αναβάθμιση» της πόλης, χωρίς σαφή αξιολόγηση κυβερνητικής επίδοσης.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
The model's explanation does not quote words from the headline itself, so we do not show it.
2 of its 2 headlines on the story take this stance.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.
The second check did not confirm the headline's side, so it counts as neutral.